A lovely lens, not perfect but still very very nice. To make it look even worse, I used Perfectly Clear to bring out the detail (flare) in the shadows, heh heh. 55 min ago Hi, I recently purchased a Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR Lens. :). It's a tiny vintage lens quite solid build that is pretty light and compact. The VR does not work or much less effective than the IS on my Canon lenses. That said, this lens is always super-sharp in the center and throughout the entire image at 55mm, but at longer focal lengths can get softer on the sides at larger apertures. I certainly forgot some others which were good then. It might have to be babied a bit because of its light construction. I added no additional sharpening, having used quite a lot of lenses it is easy to say the resolution is good on that lens. This lens is only a half stop slower at the long end. Yes, snaps, that Sony is much worse and less useful than the Fujifilm lens, but still OK. Its just the Fujifilm lens is that much better (as are all Fujifilm lenses vs. Sony APSC lenses). Real world use always reveals more about a lens. It begins on the low side of moderate at 55mm, drops to truly low levels through the middle of its focal length range, and then rises to the high side of moderate at 200mm. Our articles will help you improve your knowledge. If we haven't said it enough through this review, lenses that used to cost this much didn't have much to offer other than the savings in the wallet. (purchased for $126), reviewed April 19th, 2013 The VR system minimizes image vibration in the finder, making shutter release timing and image composition easier. Thankfully Tamron has a 28-75mm which has a close focusing ability but unfortunately only at the wide end which shows the shadow of the lens in many shots. You may have inadvertently knocked your lens without realizing it. This is not an action lens. Both of the standard and telephoto zooms have a similar space-saving retractable design but, unlike the latest AF-P versions of the 18-55mm standard zoom, the 55-200mm is compatible with older Nikon DSLRs. I bet snaps for years has told everyone the Sony 55-210/6.3 is the greatest zoom ever. Buy one! Look at the sample photos. There's a reason Canon sells the 70-300 II for $500, and the 70-300L for $1350, despite the image quality being much closer than the price difference suggests. XF 55-200 looks to be just in the middle between low/cheap gears and top/expensive one. I didn't like the fact, that it is all plasticky, and also a long Zoom, the Canon STM and the Fuji XC. I own most of these lenses, and this 55-200mm DX VR II is what I prefer to take when I'm shooting DX. For this kind of lens, VR may come really handy at most situations. NIKKOR: Nikon's brand name for all their lenses. Add it to the D40 kit lens for perfect holiday shots. His shots are not great even on APS-C and awful on FF. Nowadays I mostly shoot a pocket Canon with CHDK. I don't know about way sharper this corner for the Minolta at 100mm looks pretty bad from this review. Calm down. shooting than non-VR tele lenses, including the non-VR 55-200mm, because the VR helps ensure sharp shots that otherwise are often blurred. Write your own user review for this lens. The Beercan is a solid lens, but the CA is it's weakness and it can be pretty harsh. Introduction top Sample Images Intro Specs Performance Usage Recommendations More The Nikon 55-200mm DX VR II is a superb lightweight, plastic-mount lens with outstanding performance. The real reason to pay more for other lenses is the ability to take physical abuse or to focus ultra-fast for pro sports or to cover full frame. why do you care ! This 3.6x zoom, designed exclusively for use with Nikons DX-format D-SLR cameras, features Nikons VR (Vibration Reduction) image stabilization and is perfect for portraits and action. Focus Breathing performance top. Autofocus: Yes A selection of images taken with the Nikon 55-200mm VR lens on a D5200 body at various focal lengths / apertures. Turns out people REALLY like B&W cameras, Actually, I DON'T think the Leica Q3 is a worthy upgrade to the Q2, I thought a 360 camera would ruin a family vacation but I took it anyway, I predict Canons R100 will be the biggest EOS camera for 20 years, Astrophotography in June 2023: what to shoot in the night sky this coming month, Bizarre lens alert: the macro probe lens club gets a new member, Every issue is packed with photo tips, kit reviews and inspiration. Explore Nikon's NIKKOR System DSLR camera lenses to find the best lens type for your needs. Build Quality and Handling Thanks to a mechanism incorporated in the lens barrel, smooth focusing operation in Manual focus mode is realized in the same way as users have become accustomed to with conventional manual-focus lenses by adding an appropriate torque to the focus ring. The Nikon 55-200mm VR II is significantly better for hand-held Warning 2: Lens sharpness doesn't mean much to good photographers. Wide-open at 105mm. These are all shot hand-held as BASIC JPGs; no RAW files, NORMAL or FINE JPGs or tripods were used or needed. Not the best but you'll be pleasantly surprised with the image quality. A great lens. I love this tiny lens. Even a fellow Minolta owner disagrees with you. These lenses will be designated with the abbreviation IF on the lens barrel. Perhaps i'll decide that an "upgrade" isn't really an upgrade after all (although i'd still like to get my hands on a GFX i do really like to print big for my exhibitions)Thank you for your kind word, DrewRick. You are right about the Nikon and price. Click on the image description for image and full details. As is the case with many modern AF lenses though, the price for this fairly fast AF performance is a relatively limited amount of travel on the manual focus ring, making manual focus a bit touchy. Amazingly slow and uncertain focusing at least on X-E2. Read More This entry was posted in Nikon Lens and tagged Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II , Sample Image on January 6, 2015 by admin . Have a look at LensRental's teardown of the 55-200. Excellent lens with a lot of value for the money, and extremely lightweight. I second the previous review. If you're shooting fast action sequences, you may get faster frame rates if you turn VR OFF. If i decide to move up to full frame cameras this year, it and my X-H1 will be the only things i keep maybe the 14mm and the 35mm too not a huge fan of Fuji's wider zooms, though (not always for optical reasons). This lens should be more than good enough for chasing kids playing sports. A period of reflection, i think, for now. Very impressive. It's ridiculous that people still believe you can't do professional work with smaller sensor cameras. I posted a shot at 100mm and it's sharp on the edges/corners at the bottom disproving your "quick google search". I moved to Olympus about three years ago and their Pro lenses, 12+40, 40-150, and 12-100 are excellent for close focus. Nikon doens't include a real rear cap; order a real Nikon rear cap for $4. This lens should be in your camera bag if you like blur-free photographs. And when you use extensions you also modify the effective aperture and need a lot of light. That being said looking at the dpreview gallery of the Fuji 55-200mm it's about what I thought it should be for a lens of that type (not that I'm going to buy it). I do not need a hammer like heavy metal quality. Monday, 05 January 2015, 11:59 PM NYC time. When buying expensive things, the first question one should always ask is "Yeah, but do i really need it?" Then a camera smaller than a pack of cigarettes would be far more desirable than FF (unless one can't live without shallow DoF!). News Reviews Articles Buying Guides Sample Images Videos Cameras Lenses Phones Printers Showcase Forums Galleries Challenges. It sells used for about $75 used if you know How to Win at eBay). So there I ended up with a 55-200 vr and a sb-600 to complement my sb-800 for the same amount. Not a true dealbreaker, but I find 100-200mm for example here is a photo I took at 78mm. Click on the image you want to know more about. Got my lens used from eBay, think I paid around $350. For the crazy low price it sells at it's a bit of a gem actually. I was very interested in this lens but discovered that the afs differs from the 18-70 and 70-300; it's the same lighter and slower version as used in the 18-135. All plastic mount and barrel; glass optics. The build quality is good. (We're working on a way to measure VR performance, hope to have some initial results published in the next month or so. You do realise there is a big difference in quality between the two lenses. See Nikon AF Settings for specifics on how to set your Nikon camera to track action and sports automatically. This is what the last users has tried to match. Being designed for subframe sensors, there aren't a lot of lenses yet that cover the specific focal length range of the Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6 VR, and of those available, we've tested only a very few. So I have learned to actually dial down the shutter speed if I am forced to use the low speeds due to the lighting conditions - with some quite impressive results. Unfortunately this is the downside to AF lenses; when they break down they're kind of expensive to repair. My most used lens. The tests also measure distortion and color fringing (chromatic aberration). Designed for DX (APS-C) DSLRs, the Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II has an effective zoom range of 82.5-300mm, neatly picking up the baton from Nikons DX 18-55mm kit zoom lenses. Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. You can check out some examples of what this lens is capable of on my web site. It was discontinued in 2018, but still available new for $349 at Amazon and at B&H Photo-Video. It's fast and easy to focus, but since it moves so fast, more difficult to focus precisely. Go figure. Nikon doens't include a real rear cap; order a real Nikon rear cap for $4 when you get this lens. Both of the standard and telephoto zooms have a similar space-saving retractable design but, unlike the latest 'AF-P' versions of the 18 . The AF-S DX VR Zoom-NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED is an advanced lens that pushes your DX-format D-SLR to peak performance. Photography is all about having fun versus making it a competition. VR Image Stabilization 0 matches. The picture results are the same! This lens is designed for DX-format Nikon DSLRs. Flowers. But if you are having to track your subject then you probably are still better with the VR on. VR II (shown collapsed (gets longer as zoomed), DX coverage only, 52mm filters, 10.4 oz./296g, 3.6'/1.1m close focus). Overall, a nice lens, especially for this price. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. Sticker glued into a recess on the bottom of the lens. The 55-200 is way more versatile for but I convinced myself I would enjoy the constraints of the 90. Its practical 55200mm zoom range handles group shots, landscapes, portraits and more, while its telephoto capability brings everything closer. 2015 November: $347 new; $120 refurbished if avaialble, OverallAutofocusBokeh ColorDistortion, Ergonomics Falloff Filters Flare & Ghosts, Focus Breathing HoodLateral Color Fringes. Personally its my travel/landscape zoom easy to fit in a bag and provides a lot of focal length/IQ for its size. For the crazy low price it sells at it's a bit of a gem actually.". Compatibility back to intro back to top. You say Kurt Munger image samples are not to be trusted can you link to your own library of photos taken with the Minolta 100-200 to support your claims? But the gallery and X-Pro3 sensor make it look much better than it really is, particularly for the asking price.It's hard to beat Nikon's 70-300 AF-P, both DX and FX DX version with VR can be found for $150 I believe and it's razor sharp. That's a blur that's easily noticeable when compared against the best lenses we've tested, but is as good as that of many lenses likely to be considered by even relatively well-heeled amateur shooters. But from 50mm equiv onward landscapes are good, from 135mm they get better and better. Here are first sample images of Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G VR II lens. Going back to the 55-200, it works well on faster focusing newer bodies. Here we collect sample pictures taken with the lens Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR . IQ wise the Nikon is decent but the fuji is excellent. The other option would be the new Tamron FE, but we went up to 1,000 and lost OSS . My A6500 has ibis, but it cannot deal with 270mm equiv. Now that I have learned (I think) the peculiarities of this lens I find myself much happier with its performance. Nikon Z8 sample gallery. Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear. https://live.staticflickr.com/5596/15051686511_a5319e9f29_b.jpg, This was at 95mm full framehttps://live.staticflickr.com/8602/15943055305_4098a22dfe_h.jpg. You may have to stop down to get that extra crispness at 200mm but it's also quite good wide open. I was not surprised about the handling difference, but the rendering and bokeh of the 55-200 was so much much superior, I never regretted having spent twice the price for it nor carrying the extra weight. Even if you break it outside of warranty, it's cheap enough that you can buy another and still be out less money than if you had bought the larger 70-300mm VR. So why do so few photographers own this lens? I don't do weddings or paid shoots so I don't need a "workhorse".There is hope that the new QIS sensor tech will replace CMOS and provide tiny sensors with far less noise & artifacts. Really awesome work -- bookmarked your site. And I must say: i am very very pleasant surprised!!!! "Affordable" is relative, this is the great XF Zoom Companion for the XF 18-55, which is also basically avialable since the X-Mount beginning. I must have overlooked this tear-down Lens Rentals Article, as it was already being done into 2016 - so DPR is seriously looking for new content here. Because of its light weight, it's a bit hard to hold steady enough for the sharpest results it's capable of. All those other lenses are much larger full-frame lenses, and I just don't feel like carrying them. Thanks to a mechanism incorporated in the lens barrel, smooth focusing operation in Manual focus mode is realized in the same way as users have become accustomed to with conventional manual-focus lenses by adding an appropriate torque to the focus ring. The light weight and small size are the best things about this lens. Distortion: Theres minor barrel distortion at 55mm, virtually no distortion at 75mm and just a little pincushion at longer focal lengths. Ken Rockwell. Most of the problems happened on the dimly-lit dance floor. ED: Magic Extra-low Dispersion glass for reduced secondary chromatic aberration. "Lot of mirrorless dudes use adapters that's part of the fun", We also agree that vintage lens usage has become more popular for a segment of photographers thanks to mirrorless camera with their short flange distance. Unless they have a weak copyLeave the other stuff out of it, if you're a "need buying confirmation" dude you came to the wrong place. What is the point of this lens, can anyone tell me why you would own it and what you would use it for?Good luck in giving a compelling argument for what this lens was made for. Filters, Use with performance top. Lensora.com. . I wound up picking up the 90 f/2 used. That said, it is nowhere as versatile as the 18-200mm, which covers the entire range from wide to telephoto, which accounts for and perhaps excuses some of its optical shortcomings. Yet I pixel peep quite a bit so nope I don't rate his reviews based on my own experienceThere are plenty of user reviews/samples of that lens and it's a very optically good lens, very small and costs peanuts. As you can see at Sample Images, the 55-200 is more than sharp enough for any legitimate purpose. cheap,the VR works as well as my Canon IS, excellent value , SWM, light, small, fairly fast focus, nice bokah, feels well made, 52mm filters, can hunt for focus at 200mm from time to time, plastic mount, 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED VR DX AF-S Nikkor, reviewed March 5th, 2014 I support my growing family through this website, as crazy as it might seem. Also the 50-230 was for quite some time the longest lens in Fujifilm's lineup. The approved sources I use ship from secure, remote automated warehouses where salespeople or other customers never, ever get to touch your camera, and they have the best prices, selection, service and return policies. I have this lens and it never fails to perform. Only gripe is that it was horrible for close focus. But leave the trash talk on the basketball court. in Nikon 55-200mm vr: luster,brilliance,shining pictures. So instead of going full frame, or Fuji, I would rather get another identical pocket cam just in case mine stops working.One of my favorite cameras is actually D610 but I don't own it simply because I wouldn't take it out due to its size. Don't get me wrong, I love X-E2 as much as I say they should have kept the button placements for the X-E3. If you wish to make a printout for personal use, you are granted one-time permission only if you PayPal me $5.00 per printout or part thereof. You don't need VR for fast action in good light; you need VR for dim light. I tried it on my D200 and D70s and the results are very same. See camera and lens details Your images show slightly unsharp results in the middle and with low contrast. Each image has information with which camera and settings it was shot with. AF-S NIKKOR lenses feature Nikons Silent Wave Motor (SWM). Good lenses in general but if I want close focusing they are all just plain had. Excellent mid range lens. He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners! I've sold plenty of photos taken with the XT2 XF55-200mm. To be sure you always pay a premium for new, first party lenses - whether it be for Fuji, Nikon or Sony. Brands List; . Our articles will help you improve your knowledge. For the "VFA" target (the viewfinder accuracy target from Imaging Resource), we also provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each shot, so you can quickly get a sense of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. The compact zoom lens offers powerful zoom performance of 55-200mm (providing a picture angle equivalent to an 82-300mm lens in 35mm format) and is suitable for every type of photography. But i suspect i want some things that Fujifilm cannot provide with their crop sensor camera and lenses at this point in time. - Nikon 180mm 2.8 ai-s ED 200$ Won't work well on film or FX cameras. Value for money, this is one of the best deals in the Nikon line. By clicking Sign Up, you are opting to receive promotional, educational, e-commerce and product registration emails from Nikon Inc. You can update your preferences or unsubscribe any time. A Nikon in-lens technology that improves image stability by automatically compensating . Here we collect sample pictures taken with the lens Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED VR . "Are you honestly ignorant?" You have to let the AF system focus at infinity. I mean for the price of $300 the 55-200 is OK, but it's a $300 lens, and really the Fuji 55-200 is a step up from a kit lens (their kit lens is really the 50-230mm, which is about $400, but optically very similar to the 55-200 from what I've seen, although a bit slower than the 55-200 Fuji). Anyway, my findings were that it was a excellent lens. Some reviewers already reported malfunction of this inferior afs. I replaced mine with the 18-135 ONLY because of the lack of close focusing capability. Click here to get back to Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5,6 G ED. Problem solved. Lol compare to Minolta 100-200mm F4, smaller, lighter FF compatible and way sharper with better bokeh ;-D Oh and it's a ton cheaper. Landscape Photography. The only gotcha is that you have to remember to unlock it. I haven't purchased a new camera or lens in around 4 years. Sony Xperia 1 IV Review. Unlike most of the alphanumeric The Fuji 55-200 blows the el cheapo Nikon 55-200 VR away in terms of image quality, build, apperture, even autofocus in my opinion. Crop from above image at 100%. Results are professional in good light. I also agree that it doesn't look as bad as in your photo although I remain undecided on what that means - maybe there is a huge QC variation among lenses, or some lenses have degraded optical somehow over 30 years both of which would make me more careful to buy one. As shot on my D5500, there are none. ", "It's not a lens that's ideal for APS-C as 100mm is 150mm FOV equivalent, sure you can a 300mm FOV at 200mm, but it's a bit long for a crop camera at the shorter end.". This was one of the reasons Imoved over to m43 and never looked back. @ Maxxum Fan: First things first: Everyone is entitled to have their own opinion. Also, this is not weather-resistant (WR) so you must store it more carefully. Besides a direct match for its focal length range though, potential purchasers may also be comparing performance against the long end of the 18-200/250mm "vacation zooms", or perhaps against the shorter end of 70-300mm lenses. These aren't facts or specifications, they are the results of my research that requires hours of photography and calculations on the resulting data. Lateral chromatic aberration shows up at both ends of the zoom range, towards the edges and corners of the image frame, when uncorrected in-camera, as with early Nikon DSLRs. offer instant manual focus override: you have to move a switch, but That half stop is a non issue. AF is smooth and reasonably fast and sure. Combined with no autofocus for most camera systems and your suggestion is kind of DOA. Once in the 1/40-1/100 range the VR for some reason is hit or miss. It's a plastic lens. If you're considering the Nikon D5100, these sample images should give you a good idea of the camera's image quality in various real-world situations. If these prices are representative of Fujis lenses in general then in a substantial number of cases Fuji shooters are being taken to the cleaners. Still as I mentioned no/limited autofocus is kind of a deal breaker most people on non-Sony/Minolta camera systems. At 200mm you need a monster extension tube. camera-original file. I mean I get that your zealously pro-vintage Minolta but do you really think your petty heckling of other people's gear is convincing those same to switch to your team? (purchased for $300), reviewed May 1st, 2007 This is a sharp, featherweight, well performing lens. A-M stands for Auto-Manual Mode. We used it to shoot mountains, wildlife and some scenes from the American west. Fringing: Theres little color fringing to be seen in the central sector of the zoom range but it can be noticeable at each end towards the edges and corners of the frame, when using early Nikon DSLRs that dont feature in-camera correction. Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED VR II: Price Comparison, We check over 250 million products every day for the best prices. Wide-open at 200mm. Nikon 55-200mm VR II Internal Diagram. The Fuji has a serious loss of contrast at 200mm, that is quite clear and I think it's too expensive for what it is. At the moment I decided to live with it since it's still functional. That's a noticeable amount of pincushion, but not more than we've seen in many other lenses we've tested in the past. In an earlier life he was a broadcast engineer at the BBC, as well as a former editor of PC Guide. The shots are entirely different, I merely posted a photo to disprove the Kurt review about bad edge/corner performance at 100mm. Portrait and landscape lens. It weighs 1 ounce (30g) less than the old model. I'm very impressed with this lens - but I f'd up. The Nikon AF-S DX VR Zoom-NIKKOR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED is an ideal telephoto zoom lens for those seeking a lightweight all-in-one lens or a companion lens for the 18-55mm kit lens that came with their camera. I think this Nikon cheap zoom is nice ,with decent IQ but poorly constructed and my lens worn out , the plastic mount torn now. So I took it upon it myself to do some due diligence if seeing if your claims had any merit before replying. Reality bites, you're the one who said the lens was no good looking at "one single review" which I've shown to be inaccurate. It pops in a pocket and I'm good to go. The AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED also incorporates proven Nikon features and technologies such as the SWM, which offers quiet and smooth autofocusing, and one ED glass element that provide higher resolution and high-contrast images.
Entrepreneur Middle East, Does Sterling Silver Scratch, Active Vs Passive Gnss Antenna, Baby Girl Spring Clothes, Enfagrow Premium Gentlease Toddler Nutritional Drink, Spellbinder Die Cutting Machine, Priming Diesel Fuel Filter, Westin Cape Coral 1 Bedroom Suite,
